The h4831sc load data Diaries
The h4831sc load data Diaries
Blog Article
I am a real admirer on the H4831 powder. I get excellent velocity and accuracy from any caliber I have experimented with it in. With the 25-06 up for the 338 it truly is my check out powder of alternative. I check out all sorts of powders when Doing work up loads, although the H4831 generally appears to appear out on top for precision and velocity when the situation is with the 06 course or more substantial.
I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was creating extra force and was slower than the aged stuff. I do not don't forget if I even attempted regular h4831 or not; I'm wondering not. Click on to expand...
You happen to be right They are really precisely the same the SC is short Minimize so it meters much better, I do not Assume you can find just common 4831 any more
With all the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior groups and very good velocity, but Rottweil R905 has a noticeably higher velocity and offers marginally improved accuracy. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos while in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave fantastic accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally far better. For that reason, in Just about every of such situations I went with One more powder, but I would definitely loathe to divest myself from the H4831.
Thornton, CO Offer of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down as well so get what you may need on your new load I'd suggest. Can be all of very little whenever they restock almost everything shortly but Those people powders are getting transportation regulation troubles.
Did you at any time attempt H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. Wondering What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
If there isn't any load data it truly is because this powder is not really ideal for this cartridge. Typically a single won't uncover a person powder to fit all cartridges, plus the relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you will be inquiring about doesn't do the job.
excaliber mentioned: I've discovered the precise opposite to be legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
You could possibly either: 1) Continue and also have the firearm(s) detailed down below mechanically removed from your h4831 vs h4831sc purchasing cart:
It is amusing how over the years loading countless diverse cartridges in a variety of rifles which i have never received satisfactory close benefits with H-4831 or the limited-cut Model.
If there is absolutely no load data it's mainly because this powder isn't suited to this cartridge. Generally just one will not find a single powder to suit all cartridges, and the household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you are asking about won't work. Click to grow...
It can be likely that no more discussion is needed, where circumstance we suggest commencing a different thread. If having said that you feel your response is required you'll be able to nevertheless accomplish that.
I realize the H4831SC gives a far better load h4831sc load data density But I feel I have more than enough area in my case for the traditional H4831.
I sawed 1 in 50 percent to discover how thick the jackets were, and they had been simply two times as thick for a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for the 64-grain Energy h4831sc load data Level, as these bullets are created for deer, not prairie canine or woodchucks. You now know all the things I understand about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I do not know just about anything at all concerning the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's know the way it goes.